This article is a translation of the Japanese original. Where the two differ, the Japanese version prevails. Read the Japanese original(日本語版を読む)
Who this article is forAn enquiry from the applicant themselves about applying for permanent residence first, after withdrawing a naturalization application.
It is possible to apply for permanent residence. However, since the gift tax matter spans several years and the most recent is the 2025 tax year (令和7年分), we consider it better to disclose it from the start and briefly explain the circumstances. Please also note that under the current guidelines, even if the tax has been paid by the time of application, if it was not paid within the original payment period, it is in principle evaluated negatively.
An enquiry from the applicant themselves about applying for permanent residence first, after withdrawing a naturalization application.
Applying itself is possible, but the late payment may be evaluated negatively in the examination.
Applying itself is possible. However, please note that the fact that payment was late may be evaluated negatively in the examination.
Since the matter spans several years and includes the most recent tax year, we consider it better to disclose it from the start and briefly explain the circumstances.
It is difficult to judge without looking at the whole case, but even if the residence record has been good in other respects for 25 years, the gift tax matter spans several years and the most recent is the 2025 tax year (令和7年分), so we consider it better to disclose it from the start and briefly explain the circumstances.
If it was not paid within the original payment period, it is in principle evaluated negatively.
The current guidelines state: "Regarding the fulfillment of public obligations, even if the tax has been paid by the time of application, if it was not paid within the original tax payment period, it is in principle evaluated negatively." It is important to understand this point and then consider how to respond.
Applying itself is possible. However, the fact that payment was late may be evaluated negatively in the examination.
If the matter spans several years and includes the most recent tax year, we consider it better to disclose it from the start and briefly explain the circumstances.
Under the current guidelines, even if the tax has been paid by the time of application, if it was not paid within the original payment period, it is in principle evaluated negatively.
Tell us your situation. A 申請取次行政書士 from a partner office will answer you directly. Consultations in Japanese, English and other languages.
Get a free consultationThis article provides general information. Immigration rules change, and outcomes depend on individual circumstances. Please check the Immigration Services Agency website or consult a qualified specialist.
This page is a translation of the Japanese original. Because it is a translation, the meaning may differ from the original in places. Where something affects a decision you are making, please check the Japanese version or ask us. The supervision by a 行政書士 is of the Japanese version.