This article is a translation of the Japanese original. Where the two differ, the Japanese version prevails. Read the Japanese original(日本語版を読む)
Who this article is forTrying again for permanent residence from 定住者, an enquiry from the applicant herself.
If the denial of permanent residence was only because the independent livelihood requirement was not met, the reason why the period of stay under 定住者 has so far been set at 3 years may be the same. Setting aside matters such as age, a 5-year period of stay is said to be the guide for permanent residence; at the same time, considering the steep rise in fees (revenue stamp costs) and reports of stricter screening, one approach is said to be to switch early to an employment contract, build up a record of several years (up to the point where a fixed-term contract becomes open-ended, if it is fixed-term), and then apply for permanent residence.
Trying again for permanent residence from 定住者, an enquiry from the applicant herself.
If the denial was only because the independent livelihood requirement was not met, the reason for the 3-year period of stay may be the same.
If the denial of permanent residence was only because the independent livelihood requirement was not met, the reason why the period of stay under 定住者 has so far been set at 3 years may be the same.
A 5-year period of stay is considered to be the guide for permanent residence.
Setting aside matters such as age, a 5-year period of stay is considered to be the guide for permanent residence.
One approach is said to be to switch early to an employment contract, build up a record of several years, and then apply for permanent residence.
Considering the steep rise in revenue stamp costs as a fee and reports of stricter screening, one approach is said to be to switch early to an employment contract, build up a record of several years (up to the point where a fixed-term employee becomes open-ended), and then apply for permanent residence.
If the denial was only because the independent livelihood requirement was not met, the reason why the period of stay under 定住者 has been set at 3 years may be the same.
Setting aside matters such as age, a 5-year period of stay is said to be the guide for permanent residence.
One approach is said to be to switch early to an employment contract, build up a record of several years (up to the point where a fixed-term contract becomes open-ended), and then apply for permanent residence.
Tell us your situation. A 申請取次行政書士 from a partner office will answer you directly. Consultations in Japanese, English and other languages.
Get a free consultationThis article provides general information. Immigration rules change, and outcomes depend on individual circumstances. Please check the Immigration Services Agency website or consult a qualified specialist.
This page is a translation of the Japanese original. Because it is a translation, the meaning may differ from the original in places. Where something affects a decision you are making, please check the Japanese version or ask us. The supervision by a 行政書士 is of the Japanese version.